Panel discussion on...
Pet Supplements
Karen E. Todd
RD & Vice President Global Brand Marketing, Kyowa Hakko

Member of AgroFOOD Industry Hi Tech's Scientific Advisory Board

Is there room for innovative pet ingredient development?
1A) The pet supplement sector is still building its scientific foundation. While human supplements benefit from decades of large, randomized controlled trials, validated biomarkers, and widely accepted clinical endpoints, companion animal research is comparatively younger and less standardized. Many studies in pets involve smaller populations or shorter durations, and consensus around endpoints such as mobility, cognition, or skin health continues to evolve. Long-term safety data are also more limited. Strengthening species-specific research, expanding study scale and duration, and clearly defining meaningful health outcomes will be essential to closing this gap and reinforcing confidence in the category.
1B) Human data can be highly valuable in the early stages of development. It helps clarify mechanisms of action, identify promising compounds, and guide formulation strategy. However, it cannot stand alone as definitive proof for pets. Dogs and cats have distinct metabolic pathways, digestive physiology, and nutrient requirements that can significantly influence how an ingredient performs. Responsible development requires confirming safety, establishing appropriate dosing, and demonstrating efficacy directly in the target species. Human research can inform direction, but species-specific validation builds true credibility.
1C) Pet humanization has clearly raised expectations around quality, transparency, and scientific support. Owners are more informed and engaged, and they increasingly seek products that mirror the standards they expect for themselves. That shift has encouraged cleaner labels, improved sourcing practices, and stronger claims substantiation. At the same time, assuming that human outcomes will translate identically to pets can create unrealistic expectations. Clear and balanced communication that distinguishes between established evidence and emerging science helps align hope with reality and protects long-term trust.
1D) Safety for the specific animal, at the intended dose and duration of use, must always come first. An ingredient tolerated well in humans is not automatically appropriate for dogs or cats. Once safety is established, consistent identity and standardization of the active component are essential to ensure reliability from batch to batch. Demonstrating absorption and bioavailability in the target species further confirms that the ingredient can deliver its intended benefit. Validating stability in the finished delivery format, whether chew, powder, or liquid, ensures that label claims remain accurate throughout shelf life. Together, these elements form the backbone of responsible product development.
1E) Today’s pet owners are looking beyond marketing language and focusing more closely on ingredient lists and sourcing practices. Clean label expectations, such as the absence of artificial colors, flavors, or unnecessary additives, are increasingly influencing purchasing behavior. Sustainability has also become part of the conversation, with growing interest in responsible sourcing, ethical production, and environmental impact. While simplicity and sustainability must be balanced with efficacy and safety, brands that openly share credible documentation about origin, testing, and quality systems are more likely to build lasting loyalty.
4B) The future of the pet supplement sector will be defined by scientific rigor, regulatory evolution, and collaborative standards. Companies that invest in well-designed, species-specific studies and publish transparent data will stand apart from those relying primarily on marketing narratives. As regulatory oversight becomes clearer and more harmonized globally, brands with strong documentation and quality systems will be better positioned for expansion. Sustained success will depend on maintaining consumer trust through responsible innovation, honest communication, and a shared commitment to advancing evidence-based nutrition for companion animals.
In this Panel Discussion, several prominent companies within the food and nutraceutical ingredient industry have been invited to discuss about drivers and barriers of healthy lifestyle, focusing on global and regional consumer trends, scientific achievements, emerging delivery formats, use of AI technologies and the implementation of the United Nations sustainability goals.
Panelists
References and notes
- Schunck, M. , Louton, H. and Oesser, S. (2017) The Effectiveness of Specific Collagen Peptides on Osteoarthritis in Dogs-Impact on Metabolic Processes in Canine Chondrocytes. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 7, 254-266. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2017.73020.
- Koivisto et al., 2014; Siebert et al., 2010
- The oral intake of specific Bioactive Collagen Peptides (BCP) improves gait and quality of life in canine osteoarthritis patients—A translational large animal model for a nutritional therapy option
Dobenecker B, Böswald LF, Reese S, Steigmeier-Raith S, Trillig L, et al. (2024) The oral intake of specific Bioactive Collagen Peptides (BCP) improves gait and quality of life in canine osteoarthritis patients—A translational large animal model for a nutritional therapy option. PLOS ONE 19(9): e0308378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308378
Questions
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ingredients companies - clinical data
A) What are the main scientific gaps that still exist in PET supplement development compared to human dietary supplements?
B) How important is species-specific research when selecting and developing active ingredients for pets? Can human data ever be sufficient?
C) Is the humanization of pets helping consumers make better-informed choices, or does it risk creating unrealistic expectations about supplement performance?
D) From an ingredient supplier’s perspective, which quality parameters (standardization, bioavailability, purity) are most critical for PET applications?
E) How are trends such as “clean label,” sustainability, and transparency influencing pet owners’ purchasing decisions in the PET supplement space?
F) What type of clinical evidence should realistically be expected to support PET supplement claims today?
G) Which types of claims are most likely to be misunderstood by consumers, and how can this risk be reduced through clearer substantiation and labeling?
H) What are the main methodological challenges in conducting clinical trials for companion animals, and how can they be addressed?
I) How reliable are owner-reported outcomes compared to veterinary assessments, and how should they be integrated into study design?
L) Have you noticed an increasing trend in the use of one (or more) ingredients for pet supplements formulated to promote healthy ageing?
Formulation
A) What are the biggest formulation challenges in PET supplements, particularly regarding palatability, stability, and dosing accuracy?
B) How do formulation choices (e.g., chews, powders, liquids) influence compliance and consistent use from a consumer perspective?
C) Do you see a shift toward simpler, single-ingredient formulations, or are multi-active blends still the dominant approach? Why?
D) How do species differences (dogs vs cats, size, age) influence formulation strategies?
E) Omega 3 alternatives for pet nutrition and sustainability: how do the innovative omega-3s for pet food stack up against their traditional fishy counterparts?
Regulation
A) How do regulatory frameworks for PET supplements differ between the EU and the US, and what challenges do these differences create for global brands?
B) Which types of claims represent the highest regulatory risk today, and which are more likely to be acceptable if properly substantiated?
C) Do you expect regulatory oversight of PET supplements to become stricter in the coming years? Why or why not?
D) What role should veterinarians play in guiding pet owners’ choices regarding PET supplements, and how can trust between brands, vets, and consumers be strengthened?
Open questions
A) Looking ahead 5–10 years, what will be the key factors determining the credibility and long-term success of the PET supplements sector?
B) In your view, what single change—scientific, regulatory, or educational—would most improve consumer trust in PET supplements over the next decade?
References and notes










